Posted by & filed under Uncategorized.

The minutes of the recordings of the receiving institution contain at least the minimum information requested in this model of the learning agreement. Table C (or the institution`s representation of it) contains all the elements of teaching agreed upon in Table A and, if there is a change in the curriculum abroad, in table Abis. In addition, class allocation information must be included or attached to the record (a web link to find this information is sufficient). The actual start and end dates are repeated according to the following definitions: the apprenticeship agreement must contain all the pedagogical components to be implemented by the student in the host institution (Table A) and it must also include the group of educational components which, after completing his studies abroad, will be replaced by the sending institution (Table B). Before mobility, it is necessary to complete in depth tables A and B. Other lines can be added to tables A and B if necessary. Additional columns can be added, for example. B to indicate the level of cycle of the education component. The presentation of this document can also be adapted by the institutions to their specific needs. However, in all cases, the two tables A and B must be maintained separately, i.e.

they cannot be merged. The objective is to make it clear that there is no one-for-one correspondence (neither on the merits nor in terms of credits) between courses that follow abroad and courses replaced by sending institutions. Rather, the goal is to ensure that a group of learning outcomes obtained abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes in the mailing facility, without having a one-for-one match between certain modules or courses. The sending institution must fully recognize the number of ectS points (or equivalents) in Table A if studies abroad do not change and the student succeeds. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the apprenticeship agreement and agreed upon by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits necessary for his diploma and does not need a part of the credits acquired abroad. If all credits in Table A are recognized as part of the program with the sending agency without other conditions being applied, Table B can be supplemented by a reference to the mobility window. If mobility windows are integrated into the program, simply fill Table B with a single line, as described below: for mobility windows, Table D can be completed as follows: the receiving institution undertakes to provide the sending institution and the student with a registration protocol within a time frame set by the inter-institutional agreement, and usually no more than five weeks after the publication/proclamation of the student`s results.

Comments are closed.